Clinical features and prognosis analysis of combined mixed hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection: propensity match analysis
Zhu Runze, Mu Shaowei, Li Zhao, Zhu Jiye, Gao Jie
2024, 11(3):
25-32.
Asbtract
(
14 )
PDF (2576KB)
(
4
)
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective: To compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis of mixed hepatocellular carcinoma (mHCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after surgical resection.
Methods: The clinical data of 317 patients diagnosed with liver malignant tumors who were admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. After propensity matching with 1:1 in the degree of tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis and AJCC (8th edition) stage, 150 patients were enrolled in two independent matching cohorts: mHCC and HCC 43 cases each, mHCC and ICC 32 cases each. The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients were compared between groups. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA, and non-normally distributed continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum statistics. Chi-square test is used to compare categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meier method assesses median survival and median disease-free survival.
Results: The age, sex, and degree of cirrhosis of mHCC patients were similar to those of HCC and ICC patients, and the prevalence of hepatitis B was lower than that of HCC patients but comparable to that of ICC patients. mHCC patients had significantly higher levels of AFP than those of ICC patients, lower levels of CA19-9 than those of HCC patients, and significantly higher levels of CEA than those of the other two pathological types. mHCC's pathological features of microvascular invasion rate and lymph node metastasis rate were higher than those of HCC and comparable to those of ICC.The median survival of mHCC patients was worse than that of HCC patients (19.6 months vs. 70.8 months, P<0.001) and comparable to that of ICC patients (19.6 months vs. 40.6 months, P=0.07). mHCC patients had a worse disease-free survival than that of HCC patients and comparable to that of ICC patients. Multifactorial Cox analysis showed that lymph node metastasis, poorly differentiated tumor, tumor stage, pathological type and history of alcohol consumption were independent risk factors associated with prognosis, and that poorly differentiated tumor and tumor stage were independent risk factors for disease-free survival; multiple tumors were an independent risk factor affecting postoperative prognosis in both 1:1 matched cohorts.
Conclusions: The clinical features and prognosis of mHCC are not consistent with those of HCC and ICC, and it is a rare pathological type with a high degree of malignancy that is highly susceptible to recurrence, and it should be treated as a unique tumor type in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The mHCC has a poorer long-term survival than HCC, and it is comparable to that of ICC, and lymph node metastasis, poorly differentiated tumors, tumor stage, and a history of alcohol consumption are prognostically relevant independent risk factors, luminal surgery was a prognostically relevant independent insurance factor, and poorly differentiated tumors and tumor stage were independent risk factors for disease-free survival. The multiple tumors were found to be associated with poor prognosis and recurrent metastases in mHCC after propensity matching.