肝癌电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 42-53.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝细胞癌患者术中使用右美托咪定:对预后影响及机制分析

邵超彦1, 马中林2, 吴伟2, 吴松2, 郑立东1,*   

  1. 1.安徽医科大学附属六安医院麻醉科, 安徽六安 237005;
    2.安徽医科大学附属六安医院肝胆外科, 安徽六安 237005
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-03 出版日期:2024-09-30 发布日期:2024-11-21
  • 通讯作者: *郑立东,E-mail: zld801@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校自然科学基金面上项目(2022kykt08)

Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic impact and mechanism analysis

Shao Chaoyan1, Ma Zhonglin2, Wu Wei2, Wu Song2, Zheng Lidong1,*   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Lu’an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an 237005, Anhui, China;
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Lu’an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an 237005, Anhui, China
  • Received:2023-06-03 Online:2024-09-30 Published:2024-11-21
  • Contact: *Zheng Lidong, E-mail: zld801@163.com

摘要: 目的:探讨术中使用右美托咪定(DEX)对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者预后的影响,并研究其潜在机制。
方法:回顾性分析安徽医科大学附属六安医院2019年1月至2023年1月期间144例行肝切除术的HCC患者临床资料。通过Cox回归模型单因素和多因素分析确定DEX与HCC患者预后关联。通过生物信息学、蛋白质印迹试验、免疫组织化学(IHC)及多种在线数据库解析DEX促癌机制。
结果:144例患者平均随访时间32.9个月(范围6~48个月),其中复发63例,死亡57例。术中使用DEX患者的无复发生存率(P<0.05)和总生存率(P<0.05)低于不使用DEX患者,多因素分析发现术中使用DEX是HCC患者复发和死亡的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于GSE188867数据集和TCGA-HCC队列鉴定出6个DEX调控基因,分别为CCDC34E2F8CENPHCTHRC1CENPWE2F1。蛋白质印迹试验及IHC结果显示E2F8和E2F1在HCC组织中表达增高(P<0.05)且能被DEX快速上调(P<0.05)。计算机分子对接模型显示:DEX能稳定与E2F8中ARC-267和LYS-264残基形成氢键,结合能为-6.7 kcal/mol;能与E2F1中TYR-746残基形成氢键,结合能为-5.0 kcal/mol。基因集富集分析结果强调DEX能快速激活细胞周期信号(P<0.05)。
结论:术中DEX全身给药介导HCC患者更差预后,这过程涉及DEX能快速激活细胞周期信号,包括可能直接与E2F8和E2F1结合,应谨慎对HCC患者使用DEX。

关键词: 肝细胞癌, 右美托咪定, 预后, 蛋白质印迹试验, 免疫组织化学, 分子对接

Abstract: Objective: The aim is to investigate the impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to investigate the underlying mechanisms.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 144 HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy in Lu’an Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2019 to January 2023. The association between DEX and the prognosis of HCC patients was determined by univariate and multifactorial Cox risk regression. To resolve DEX cancer-promoting mechanisms by bioinformatics, western blotting, immunohistochemistry and various online databases.
Results: 144 patients were followed up for 6-48 months with a mean follow-up time of 32.9 months, including 63 recurred and 57 patients died. Patients with intraoperative DEX had lower recurrence-free survival (P<0.05) and overall survival (P<0.05) than those without DEX. Univariate combined with multifactorial Cox risk regression analysis identified intraoperative DEX use as an independent risk factor for recurrence and death in HCC patients (P<0.05). Six DEX-regulated genes were identified based on the GSE188867 dataset and the TCGA-HCC cohort: CCDC34, E2F8, CENPH, CTHRC1, CENPW, and E2F1. Western blotting and IHC results showed that E2F8 and E2F1 expression was increased in HCC tissues (P<0.05) and was rapidly upregulated by DEX (P<0.05). Computerized molecular docking models showed that DEX stably formed hydrogen bonds with ARC-267 and LYS-264 residues in E2F8 at a binding energy of -6.7 kcal/mol and with TYR-746 residues in E2F1 at an energy of -5.0 kcal/mol. The results of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) highlighted that DEX could rapidly activate cell cycle signaling (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Intraoperative systemic administration of DEX mediates a worse prognosis in patients with HCC, a process that involves DEX's rapid activation of cell cycle signaling, including possible direct binding to E2F8 and E2F1. DEX should be used with caution in patients with HCC.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Dexmedetomidine, Prognosis, Western blotting, Immunohistochemistry, Molecular docking