肝癌电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2): 35-40.

• 护理园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝动脉灌注化疗期间解除卧床限制活动方案的构建与应用

赵晓芸, 靳勇*, 陈香凤, 黄慧, 周会敏   

  1. 苏州大学附属第二医院介入科,江苏苏州 215008
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-10-26
  • 通讯作者: *勒勇,E-mail: jinyong@suda.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵晓芸,苏州大学附属第二医院,介入科

Construction and application of activity program for relieving bed restriction in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy treatment

Zhao Xiaoyun, Jin Yong*, Chen Xiangfeng, Huang Hui, Zhou Huimin   

  1. Department of Intervention, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215008, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2022-01-25 Published:2022-10-26

摘要: 目的:探讨肝动脉灌注化疗(hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy,HAIC)期间解除卧床限制的安全性和可行性。
方法:选取符合入组标准的原发性肝细胞癌患者,按照入院先后顺序分为研究组(n=50)和对照组(n=20)。研究组患者基于加速康复外科理念构建FOLFOX-HAIC解除卧床限制活动方案,股动脉置管后6h携带动脉导管下床活动;对照组患者置管后至药物灌注期间均卧床,药物输注完毕,拔除股动脉导管后下床。使用数字分级评分法(numerical rating scale,NRS)评估患者的疼痛程度,采用Kolcaba的舒适状况量表(general comfort questionnaire,GCQ)、Barthel指数评定量表(Barthel index,BI)评估患者日常生活,记录术后并发症及不良事件的发生情况。
结果:本组70例患者均顺利完成FOLFOX-HAIC。两组患者在治疗期间均无跌倒、死亡等不良事件发生;两组患者股动脉穿刺处出血及皮下血肿发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗期间两组患者均出现体外接口断裂1例[研究组2.0%(1/50),对照组5.0%(1/20),P>0.05],可能与微导管质量相关,更换导管后,再未发生;两组患者肢体麻木、腰酸、食欲减退、便秘、睡眠障碍等术后并发症发生率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗期间两组患者舒适状况和生活自理能力差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。
结论:FOLFOX-HAIC解除卧床限制的方案可尝试在临床使用。

关键词: 肝动脉灌注化疗, 肝细胞癌, 早期活动, 不良事件

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the safety and feasibility of relieving bed restriction during hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).
Method:Select patients with primary liver cancer in line with the enrollment criteria, divided them into the experimental group (n=50) and control group (n=20) according to the order of admission date, the experimental group built FOLFOX-HAIC for relieving bed restriction activity program based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept, the patients in this group could get out of bed with an arterial catheter 6 hours after femoral artery catheterization; The patients in the control group were strictly confined to bed after catheterization until drug infusion, and got out of bed after drug infusion and femoral arterial catheter extraction. The complications of the two groups were observed. The pain level was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The Improved Changhai pain rating scale was used to evaluate patients' pain degree, and the daily life of patients in the two groups was evaluated by the Kolcaba general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) and Barthel index (BI). The incidence of postoperative complications and adverse events were recorded.
Result:Totally 70 cases of primary liver cancer treated with FOLFOX-HAIC were successfully completed FOLFOX-HAIC. The results showed that there were no adverse events such as falls and deaths in both groups after treatment. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the femoral artery puncture point bleeding and subcutaneous hematoma. There was 1 case of external interface rupture in each group during the treatment period (experimental group 1/50, 2.0%; control group 1/20, 5.0%; P>0.05), which may be related to the quality of microcatheter, after communicating with relevant departments to replace the catheter, this phenomenon did not occur again. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in postoperative complications: limb numbness, lumbar acid, loss of appetite, constipation and sleep disorders (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in comfort status and self-care ability between the two groups during the period of perfusion chemotherapy (both P<0.001).
Conclusion:FOLFOX-HAIC for relieving bed restriction scheme can be tried clinically.

Key words: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Early activity, Adverse events