肝癌电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 18-25.

• 护理园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于整合加速康复外科理念的肝癌术后腹胀管理的最佳证据总结

袁蕊, 康永姣, 刘娜, 何凤英   

  1. 中山大学肿瘤防治中心肝脏外科,广东广州,510060
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2026-08-12

Based on the integration of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, the best evidence summary for the management of abdominal distension after liver cancer surgery

Yuan Rui, Kang Yongjiao, Liu Na, He Fengying   

  1. Surgery Department of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou510060, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2025-08-20 Published:2026-08-12

摘要: 目的:系统检索、评价并总结肝癌手术后腹胀管理的最佳证据,为临床实践提供循证依据。
方法:从建库至2024年10月30日,用计算机检索UpToDate、BMJ Best Practice、Cochrane Library、PubMed、中国知网、万方数据库等中英文数据库,纳入与肝癌术后腹胀相关的临床指南、专家共识、系统评价、随机对照试验及证据总结。由2名研究者独立完成文献筛选、质量评价及证据提取,依据可行性、适宜性、有效性、临床意义的原则对证据进行分级与整合。
结果:从826篇文献中共纳入13篇文章,包括7篇指南、1篇专家共识、2篇随机对照试验及3篇其他类型研究。最终从术前管理(多学科团队协作、肠道准备)、术后管理(镇痛、液体管理、饮食恢复、早期活动)及辅助干预(咀嚼口香糖、乳果糖应用)等方面总结出15条最佳证据。弥补国内研究维度空白,覆盖多环节协同及个体差异适配,较同类研究更具全面性与精准性,明晰多维度干预协同改善腹胀的作用规律。
结论:本研究构建的证据体系,为肝癌术后腹胀规范化、个体化循证护理奠定基础,助力临床精准应对患者需求;但证据体系仍需完善,需进一步开展高质量研究,持续优化肝癌术后腹胀管理实践 。

关键词: 肝癌术后, 腹胀管理, 证据总结, 循证护理, 加速康复外科

Abstract: Objective:To systematically retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for the management of abdominal distension after liver cancer surgery, providing an evidence-based basis for clinical practice.
Methods:From database inception to October 30, 2024, a computerized search was conducted in Chinese and English databases, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang Data etc, to identify clinical guidelines, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and evidence summaries related to postoperative abdominal distension in liver cancer patients. The search timeframe spanned. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, quality assessment, and evidence extraction. The evidence was graded and synthesized according to the feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness, effectiveness principles.
Results:From 826 publications, a total of 13 articles were included, consisting of 7 guidelines, 1 expert consensus, 2 randomized controlled trials, and 3 studies of other types. Finally, 15 pieces of best evidence were summarized from aspects such as preoperative management (multidisciplinary team collaboration, intestinal preparation), postoperative management (analgesia, fluid management, dietary recovery, early ambulation), and auxiliary interventions (chewing gum, application of lactulose). This fills the gap in the research dimensions of domestic studies, covers the synergy of multiple links and adaptation to individual differences, and is more comprehensive and precise than similar studies. It clarifies the mechanism by which multi-dimensional interventions synergistically improve abdominal distension, reaching the advanced level in China.
Conclusions:The evidence system constructed in this study lays a foundation for standardized and individualized evidence-based nursing for postoperative abdominal distension in liver cancer, helping clinical practice to accurately meet patients' needs. However, the evidence system still needs to be improved, and further high-quality studies are required to continuously optimize the management practice of postoperative abdominal distension in liver cancer.

Key words: Post-hepatectomy, Abdominal distension management, Evidence summary, Evidence-based nursing, Enhanced recovery after surgery